Tag Archives: Peter Unger

From Neural ‘Is’ to Moral ‘Ought’

This talk takes its inspiration from Joshua Greene’s ‘From neural ‘is’ to moral ‘ought’: what are the moral implications of neuroscientific moral psychology?’ He says: “Many moral philosophers regard scientific research as irrelevant to their work because science deals with … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Some Good Reason

  This is the 19th part of the ‘Neural Is to Moral Ought’ series of posts. The series’s title comes from Joshua Greene’s opinion-piece paper ‘From Neural Is To Moral Ought: What are the moral implications of neuroscientific moral psychology?’ … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Caring

(This is the eleventh part of the ‘From Neural Is to Moral Ought’ series.) 47: The Missing Component From what has been said previously: Morality is about balancing the wants of oneself with the wants of others. To do that: 1: We need … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , | 3 Comments

Moral Equalization

This is the third part of the ‘From Neural Is to Moral Ought’ series of talks. Here, I relate the engineering principle of ‘equalization’ to morality, for reasons which will hopefully become apparent in later parts. 11: Some Good Reason The … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , | 6 Comments